2 minute read

Perturbations in Classical Mechanics vs. Quantum Physics

While both classical mechanics and quantum physics employ the term perturbation to denote a small deviation from some reference state, their implementations and outcomes differ significantly.

1. Classical Perturbations: Simple Harmonic Response

A small disturbance of a stable equilibrium in classical mechanics typically induces (possibly damped) simple harmonic motion. Starting from Newton’s second law,

\[F = m\ddot{x},\]

a restoring force of the form $F = -\alpha x$ (with $\alpha > 0$) gives

\[-m\ddot{x} = \alpha x \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \ddot{x} + \frac{\alpha}{m}\,x = 0,\]

whose solution is sinusoidal with frequency $\omega = \sqrt{\tfrac{\alpha}{m}}$.

2. Central-Force Orbits and Radial Equation

For a particle of mass $m$ under a purely radial force $F_r(r)$, conservation of angular momentum $h = r^2\dot{\theta}$ and Newton’s second law yield:

\[\ddot{r} - \frac{h^2}{r^3} = \frac{F_r(r)}{m}.\]

A circular orbit at radius $r = a$ satisfies:

\[0 - \frac{h^2}{a^3} = \frac{F_r(a)}{m},\quad \Longrightarrow\quad F_r(a) = -\frac{m\,h^2}{a^3}.\]

3. Small Radial Perturbations of a Circular Orbit

Introduce a tiny radial displacement:

\[r(t) = a + \rho(t),\quad |\rho| \ll a.\]

Substitute into the radial equation:

\[\ddot{\rho} - \frac{h^2}{(a + \rho)^3} = \frac{F_r(a + \rho)}{m}.\]

Linearize both sides via Taylor expansion to first order in $\rho$:

  1. Centrifugal term

    \[\frac{1}{(a + \rho)^3} \approx \frac{1}{a^3}\Bigl(1 - 3\frac{\rho}{a}\Bigr).\]
  2. Radial force

    \[F_r(a + \rho) \approx F_r(a) + F_r'(a)\,\rho.\]

Plugging in and cancelling the zeroth-order balance $-h^2/a^3 = F_r(a)/m$ leaves:

\[\ddot{\rho} + \Bigl[\tfrac{3h^2}{a^4} - \tfrac{1}{m}F_r'(a)\Bigr]\rho = 0.\]

Define

\[\omega^2 \equiv \tfrac{3h^2}{a^4} - \tfrac{1}{m}F_r'(a).\]

Then

\[\ddot{\rho} + \omega^2\,\rho = 0,\]

with general solution

\[\rho(t) = A\cos(\omega t + \phi).\]

Stability condition: For oscillatory (bounded) motion, $\omega^2 > 0$, i.e.

\[\frac{3h^2}{a^4} > \frac{1}{m}F_r'(a).\]

4. Escape Criterion for an Inverse-Square Force

The conserved total energy is

\[E = \tfrac12 m\bigl(\dot r^2 + r^2\dot{\theta}^2\bigr) + V(r), \quad V'(r) = -F_r(r).\]

At $t=0$, choose initial conditions

\[\dot r(0) = 0,\quad r_0 = a + \varepsilon,\quad h = r_0^2\dot{\theta}(0),\]

so the energy is

\[E = \frac{h^2}{2m\,r_0^2} + V(r_0).\]

For an inverse-square law $V(r) = -\frac{k}{r}$ with $h^2 = \tfrac{k a}{m}$, the escape threshold $E = 0$ implies

\[\frac{h^2}{2m\,r_0^2} - \frac{k}{r_0} = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad r_0 = 2a.\]

Thus any $r_0 \ge 2a$ (i.e.\ $\varepsilon \ge a$) yields $E \ge 0$ and the particle escapes.

  • Linear (local) stability
    Small oscillations around
    \(r = a\)
    will remain small—nothing “blows up” if
    \(|\rho| \ll a.\)

  • Escape (global) criterion
    If you instead give the particle a large enough “kick” so that
    \(r_0 \ge 2a,\)
    its total energy becomes non‑negative and it will escape to infinity—even though infinitesimal perturbations are stable.

Tag Styling Example

Updated: